Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2013-07-23

Re: mmotm 2013-07-18-16-40 uploaded

From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-23 13:47:56
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-next, lkml

On Fri 19-07-13 15:58:12, Johannes Weiner wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:17:44AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:00:35 -0400 Johannes Weiner [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
A git tree which contains the memory management portion of this tree is
maintained at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git
by Michal Hocko.  It contains the patches which are between the
"#NEXT_PATCHES_START mm" and "#NEXT_PATCHES_END" markers, from the series
file, http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series.


A full copy of the full kernel tree with the linux-next and mmotm patches
already applied is available through git within an hour of the mmotm
release.  Individual mmotm releases are tagged.  The master branch always
points to the latest release, so it's constantly rebasing.

http://git.cmpxchg.org/?p=linux-mmotm.git;a=summary

To develop on top of mmotm git:

  $ git remote add mmotm git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git
  $ git remote update mmotm
  $ git checkout -b topic mmotm/master
  <make changes, commit>
  $ git send-email mmotm/master.. [...]

To rebase a branch with older patches to a new mmotm release:

  $ git remote update mmotm
  $ git rebase --onto mmotm/master <topic base> topic
Andrew, that workflow is actually meant for
http://git.cmpxchg.org/?p=linux-mmotm.git;a=summary, not Michal's tree
(i.e. the git remote add mmotm <michal's tree> does not make much
sense).  Michal's tree is append-only, so all this precision-rebasing
is unnecessary.
Gee, I haven't looked at that text in a while...

Could you guys please check it, propose any fixes we should make?



README for mm-of-the-moment:

http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/

This is a snapshot of my -mm patch queue.  Uploaded at random hopefully
more than once a week.

You will need quilt to apply these patches to the latest Linus release (3.x
or 3.x-rcY).  The series file is in broken-out.tar.gz and is duplicated in
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/series

The file broken-out.tar.gz contains two datestamp files: .DATE and
.DATE-yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss.  Both contain the string yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ss,
followed by the base kernel version against which this patch series is to
be applied.

This tree is partially included in linux-next.  To see which patches are
included in linux-next, consult the `series' file.  Only the patches
within the #NEXT_PATCHES_START/#NEXT_PATCHES_END markers are included in
linux-next.

A git tree which contains the memory management portion of this tree is
                                                                ^^^
                                                       on top of the latest
                                                       Linus release

maybe?
Yes and also a mention that the lastest since-X.Y branch should be used.
 
[...]
Michal started his mm.git to have a stable memory management
development base, yet here is a long section on how to work with the
much more awkward mmotm.git.  So I wonder if this whole section on how
to develop against mmotm.git should be removed and only a reference to
where it could be found left in.

However, I have actually no idea what people use as an mm development
base these days...  
I guess Glauber was using it for his shrinker patchset. Few other random
people have asked about the tree in the past but I have no idea how many
people use the tree, to be honest.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help