On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:29:06 +0400 Glauber Costa [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Thanks for taking a look at this.
list_lru_destroy is called by deactivate_lock_super, so we should be fine already.
Sorry, I'm a little confused...
I didn't see list_lru_destroy() called in deactivate_locked_super().
Maybe I missed something?
Err... the code in my tree reads:
unregister_shrinker(&s->s_shrink);
list_lru_destroy(&s->s_dentry_lru);
list_lru_destroy(&s->s_inode_lru);
put_filesystem(fs);
put_super(s);
But then I have just checked Andrew's, and it is not there - thank you.
That is added by "super: targeted memcg reclaim", which is in the part
of the series which we decided to defer.
Andrew, should I send a patch for you to fold it ?
Sure. Perhaps you could check for any other things which should be
brought over from the not-merged-yet patches?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>