Re: [PATCH] mm: fix null pointer dereference in wait_iff_congested()
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-12-31 00:50:19
Also in:
lkml
Hi Zlatko, On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 02:29:11PM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
On 28.12.2012 03:49, Minchan Kim wrote:quoted
Hello Zlatko, On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:16:38AM +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:quoted
From: Zlatko Calusic <redacted> The unintended consequence of commit 4ae0a48b is that wait_iff_congested() can now be called with NULL struct zone* producing kernel oops like this:For good description, it would be better to write simple pseudo code flow to show how NULL-zone pass into wait_iff_congested because kswapd code flow is too complex. As I see the code, we have following line above wait_iff_congested. if (!unbalanced_zone || blah blah) break; How can NULL unbalanced_zone reach wait_iff_congested?Hello Minchan, and thanks for the comment. That line was there before commit 4ae0a48b got in, and you're right,
Argh, I didn't see 4ae0a48b in 3.8-rc1.
it's what was protecting wait_iff_congested() from being called with NULL zone*. But then all that logic got colapsed to a simple pgdat_balanced() call and that's when I introduced the bug, I lost the protection. What I _think_ is happening (pseudo code following...) is that after scanning the zone in the dma->highmem direction, and concluding that all zones are balanced (unbalanced_zone remains NULL!), wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait) wakes up a lot of memory hungry processes (especially true in various aggressive test/benchmarks) that immediately drain and unbalance one or more zones. Then pgdat_balanced() call which immediately follows will be false, but we still have unbalanced_zone = NULL, rememeber? Oops... But, all that is a speculation that I can't prove atm. Of course, if anybody thinks that's a credible explanation, I could add it as a commit comment, or even as a code comment, but I didn't want to be overly imaginative. The fix itself is simple and real.
Never mind. My confusing is caused my missing 4ae0a48b in lasest tree. Thanks, Zlatko.
Regards, -- Zlatko -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
-- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>