Re: [patch 5/7] mm: vmscan: clean up get_scan_count()
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2012-12-21 02:52:06
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:08:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:12:35 -0500 Johannes Weiner [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Reclaim pressure balance between anon and file pages is calculated through a tuple of numerators and a shared denominator. Exceptional cases that want to force-scan anon or file pages configure the numerators and denominator such that one list is preferred, which is not necessarily the most obvious way: fraction[0] = 1; fraction[1] = 0; denominator = 1; goto out; Make this easier by making the force-scan cases explicit and use the fractionals only in case they are calculated from reclaim history. And bring the variable declarations/definitions in order. ... + u64 fraction[2], uninitialized_var(denominator);Using uninitialized_var() puts Linus into rant mode. Unkindly, IMO: uninitialized_var() is documentarily useful and reduces bloat. There is a move afoot to replace it with int foo = 0; /* gcc */ To avoid getting ranted at we can do--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-clean-up-get_scan_count-fix +++ a/mm/vmscan.c@@ -1658,7 +1658,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec unsigned long *nr) { struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat; - u64 fraction[2], uninitialized_var(denominator); + u64 fraction[2]; + u64 denominator = 0; struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec); unsigned long anon_prio, file_prio; enum scan_balance scan_balance;
Makes sense, I guess, but then you have to delete this line from the changelog: "And bring the variable declarations/definitions in order." Or change it to "partial" order or something... :-) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>