Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2013-02-22

Re: [PATCH] fadvise: perform WILLNEED readahead in a workqueue

From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2012-12-16 03:03:19
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:25:49AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
Alan Cox [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:54:48 +0000
Eric Wong [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Applications streaming large files may want to reduce disk spinups and
I/O latency by performing large amounts of readahead up front
How does it compare benchmark wise with a user thread or using the
readahead() call ?
Very well.

My main concern is for the speed of the initial pread()/read() call
after open().

Setting EARLY_EXIT means my test program _exit()s immediately after the
first pread().  In my test program (below), I wait for the background
thread to become ready before open() so I would not take overhead from
pthread_create() into account.

RA=1 uses a pthread + readahead()
Not setting RA uses fadvise (with my patch)
And if you don't use fadvise/readahead at all?
# readahead + pthread.
$ EARLY_EXIT=1 RA=1 time  ./first_read 1G
0.00user 0.05system 0:01.37elapsed 3%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 600maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+187minor)pagefaults 0swaps

# patched fadvise
$ EARLY_EXIT=1 time ./first_read 1G
0.00user 0.00system 0:00.01elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 564maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1major+178minor)pagefaults 0swaps
You're not timing how long the first pread() takes at all. You're
timing the entire set of operations, including cloning a thread and
for the readahead(2) call and messages to be passed back and forth
through the eventfd interface to read the entire file.

Why even bother with another thread for readahead()? It implements
*exactly* the same operation as fadvise(WILL_NEED) (ie.
force_page_cache_readahead), so should perform identically when
called in exactly the same manner...

But again, you are interesting in the latency of the first read of
16k from the file, but you are asking to readahead 1GB of data.
Perhaps your shoul dbe asking for readahead of something more
appropriate to what you care about - the first read....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help