Tejun Heo [off-list ref] writes:
Hello, Jens.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 07:19:34PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
We need to expose it. Once the binding is set from the kernel side on a
kernel thread, it can't be modified.
That's only if kthread_bind() is used. Caling set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
doesn't set PF_THREAD_BOUND and userland can adjust affinity like any
other tasks.
quoted
Binding either for performance reasons or for ensuring that we
explicitly don't run in some places is a very useful feature.
Sure, but I think this is too specific. Something more generic would
be much better. It can be as simple as generating a uevent.
I'm in favor of a more general approach. For now, I'm still going to
push a patch that at least binds to the proper numa node. I'll post
that after I've tested it.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>