On Fri 30-11-12 13:12:29, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

(2012/11/27 3:47), Michal Hocko wrote:

quoted

Now that we have generic and well ordered cgroup tree walkers there is
no need to keep css_get_next in the place.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <redacted>

Hm, then, the next think will be css_is_ancestor() etc..

Good point I thought that the only remaining part is swap accounting. It
is not directly with the iterators so I will send a separate patch.
Tejun said he has a replacement that could be used for the swap
accounting and then the whole css_id can be buried.

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted>

Thanks for the review of the whole patchset, Kame!
I would like to hear back from Johannes and then resubmit the series to
Andrew.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>