Re: [PATCH -v2 -mm] memcg: do not trigger OOM from add_to_page_cache_locked
From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-28 16:48:28
Also in:
cgroups, lkml
Subsystem:
control group - memory resource controller (memcg), memory management, page cache, the rest, tmpfs (shmem filesystem) · Maintainers:
Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Jan Kara, Linus Torvalds, Hugh Dickins
On Wed 28-11-12 17:46:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 28-11-12 11:37:36, Johannes Weiner wrote:quoted
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:04:47PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 095d2b4..5abe441 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h@@ -57,13 +57,14 @@ extern int mem_cgroup_newpage_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask); /* for swap handling */ extern int mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm, - struct page *page, gfp_t mask, struct mem_cgroup **memcgp); + struct page *page, gfp_t mask, struct mem_cgroup **memcgp, + bool oom);Ok, now I feel almost bad for asking, but why the public interface, too?Would it work out if I tell it was to double check that your review quality is not decreased after that many revisions? :P Incremental update and the full patch in the reply
---