On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:

I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one
shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest
schednuma figures I have available.

Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202

I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with

1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as
   tip/sched/core from the time I last pulled
   patches as posted on the list
   patches posted since which are
     x86/vsyscall: Add Kconfig option to use native vsyscalls, switch to it
     mm/migration: Improve migrate_misplaced_page()
     mm, numa: Turn 4K pte NUMA faults into effective hugepage ones
     x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on #WP pmd fixups

2. autonuma + native THP support porte by Hugh

3. balancenuma with a missing THP migration bit for memcg

If all goes according to plan it'll do a pair of runs -- one with oprofile
and one without in case there are profile-related questions. Hopefully
they'll be collected correctly and usable.  I'm not using perf simply
because I do not have the necessary automation in place. I had kept oprofile
automation in place when it was important that I could run identical tests
on older kernels.

I did not just pull the tip tree for schednuma because it would not be a
like-like comparison with the other trees.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>