[PART5 Patch 5/5] memblock: compare current_limit with end variable at memblock_find_in_range_node()
From: Wen Congyang <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-31 09:16:10
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
memblock and memory management initialization, memory management, the rest · Maintainers:
Mike Rapoport, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <redacted> memblock_find_in_range_node() does not compare memblock.current_limit with end variable. Thus even if memblock.current_limit is smaller than end variable, the function allocates memory address that is bigger than memblock.current_limit. The patch adds the check to "memblock_find_in_range_node()" Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <redacted> --- mm/memblock.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index ee2e307..50ab53c 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c@@ -100,11 +100,12 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t align, int nid) { phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand; + phys_addr_t current_limit = memblock.current_limit; u64 i; /* pump up @end */ - if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE) - end = memblock.current_limit; + if ((end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE) || (end > current_limit)) + end = current_limit; /* avoid allocating the first page */ start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE);
--
1.8.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>