Re: [RFC] Support volatile range for anon vma
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-25 15:19:31
Also in:
lkml
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-25 15:19:31
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
#endif + /* + * True if page in this vma is reclaimed.
What does that mean? All pages in the vma have been cleared out?
+ TTU_IGNORE_VOLATILE = (1 << 11),/* ignore volatile */ }; #define TTU_ACTION(x) ((x) & TTU_ACTION_MASK) int try_to_unmap(struct page *, enum ttu_flags flags); int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *, struct vm_area_struct *, - unsigned long address, enum ttu_flags flags); + unsigned long address, enum ttu_flags flags, + bool *is_volatile);
You already pass a vma pointer in. Why do you need to pass a volatile flag in? Looks like unecessary churn. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>