Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 6 authors, 2012-09-08

Re: [RFC 0/5] forced comounts for cgroups.

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-09-05 09:19:33
Also in: cgroups, lkml

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:12:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
quoted
No, I never counted out differing granularity.
Can you elaborate on which interface do you envision to make it work?
They will clearly be mounted in the same hierarchy, or as said
alternatively, comounted.
I'm not sure yet.  At the simplest, mask of controllers which should
honor (or ignore) nesting beyond the node.  That should be
understandable enough.  Not sure whether that would be flexible enough
yet tho.  In the end, they should be comounted but again I don't think
enforcing comounting at the moment is a step towards that.  It's more
like a step sideways.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help