Re: Any reason to use put_page in slub.c?
From: Glauber Costa <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-02 07:58:14
On 08/01/2012 10:10 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:quoted
I've audited all users of get_page() in the drivers/ directory for patterns like this. In general, they kmalloc something like a table of entries, and then get_page() the entries. The entries are either user pages, pages allocated by the page allocator, or physical addresses through their pfn (in 2 cases from the vga ones...) I took a look about some other instances where virt_to_page occurs together with kmalloc as well, and they all seem to fall in the same category.The case that was notorious in the past was a scsi control structure allocated from slab that was then written to the device via DMA. And it was not on x86 but some esoteric platform (powerpc?), A reference to the discussion of this issue in 2007: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0706.3/0424.html
Thanks. So again, I've scanned across that thread, and found some very useful excerpts from it, that can only argue in favor of my patch =) "There are no kmalloced pages. There is only kmalloced memory. You allocate pages from the page allocator. Its a layering violation to expect a page struct operation on a slab object to work." "So someone played loose ball with the slab, was successful and that makes it right now?" Looking at the code again, I see that page_mapping(), that ends up being called to do the translation in those pathological cases now features a VM_BUG_ON(), put in place by yourself. This dates back from 2007, giving me enough reason to believe that whatever issue still existed back then is already sorted out - or nobody really cares. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>