Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2012-08-23

Re: [RFC 0/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU atomic allocation

From: Hiroshi Doyu <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-22 14:45:13
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Subsystem: arm port, the rest · Maintainers: Russell King, Linus Torvalds

Hi Marek,

Marek Szyprowski [off-list ref] wrote @ Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:04:26 +0200:
Hi Hiroshi,

On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:20 PM Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
quoted
The commit e9da6e9 "ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma
region" breaks the compatibility with existing drivers. This causes
the following kernel oops(*1). That driver has called dma_pool_alloc()
to allocate memory from the interrupt context, and it hits
BUG_ON(in_interrpt()) in "get_vm_area_caller()". This patch seris
fixes this problem with making use of the pre-allocate atomic memory
pool which DMA is using in the same way as DMA does now.

Any comment would be really appreciated.
I was working on the similar patches, but You were faster. ;-)
Thank you for reviewing my patches.
Basically the patch no 1 and 2 are fine, but I don't like the changes proposed in 
patch 3 and 4. You should not alter the attributes provided by the user nor make any
assumptions that such attributes has been provided - drivers are allowed to call 
dma_alloc_attrs() directly. Please rework your patches to avoid such
approach.
Sure. I'll send the series again later.

Instead of making use of DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING, I use the
following "__in_atomic_pool()" to see if buffer comes from atomic or
not at freeing.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help