Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives to balloon pages

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:25:28PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:05:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:11:13PM -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:39PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

quoted

What I think you should do is use rcu for access.
And here sync rcu before freeing.
Maybe an overkill but at least a documented synchronization
primitive, and it is very light weight.

I liked your suggestion on barriers, as well.

I have not thought about this as deeply as I shouold but is simply rechecking
the mapping under the pages_lock to make sure the page is still a balloon
page an option? i.e. use pages_lock to stabilise page->mapping.

To clarify, are you concerned about cost of rcu_read_lock
for non balloon pages?

Not as such, but given the choice between introducing RCU locking and
rechecking page->mapping under a spinlock I would choose the latter as it
is more straight-forward.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>