Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 4 authors, 2012-07-31

Re: [PATCH 00/10] memcg kmem limitation - slab.

From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-31 16:30:41
Also in: cgroups, lkml

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:38:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
Hi,

This is the slab part of the kmem limitation mechanism in its last form.  I
would like to have comments on it to see if we can agree in its form. I
consider it mature, since it doesn't change much in essence over the last
forms. However, I would still prefer to defer merging it and merge the
stack-only patchset first (even if inside the same merge window). That patchset
contains most of the infrastructure needed here, and merging them separately
would not only reduce the complexity for reviewers, but allow us a chance to
have independent testing on them both. I would also likely benefit from some
extra testing, to make sure the recent changes didn't introduce anything bad.
What is the status of the stack-only limitation patchset BTW? Does anybody oppose
to its merging?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help