At 07/30/2012 06:23 PM, Heiko Carstens Wrote:

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 06:32:15PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:

quoted

We don't call __add_pages() directly in the function add_memory()
because some other architecture related things need to be done
before or after calling __add_pages(). So we should introduce
a new function arch_remove_memory() to revert the things
done in arch_add_memory().

Note: the function for s390 is not implemented(I don't know how to
implement it for s390).

There is no hardware or firmware interface which could trigger a
hot memory remove on s390. So there is nothing that needs to be
implemented.

Thanks for providing this information.

According to this, arch_remove_memory() for s390 can just return -EBUSY.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>