Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2
From: Hillf Danton <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-24 13:18:18
Also in:
lkml
From: Hillf Danton <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-24 13:18:18
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith [off-list ref] wrote:
FWIW, I'm all for performance backports. They do have a downside though (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs). When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel.
Well do your job please. Suse 11 SP1 kernel panic on HP hardware https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/24/136 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>