Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/sparse: fix possible memory leak
From: Gavin Shan <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-28 06:17:07
quoted
diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c index 781fa04..a803599 100644 --- a/mm/sparse.c +++ b/mm/sparse.c@@ -75,6 +75,22 @@ static struct mem_section noinline __init_refok *sparse_index_alloc(int nid) return section; } +static void noinline __init_refok sparse_index_free(struct mem_section *section, + int nid)noinline is unecessary, this is only referenced from sparse_index_init() and it's perfectly legimitate to inline. Also, this should be __meminit and not __init.
Thanks for your comments. I'll change it into "inline __meminit" in next version :-)
quoted
+{ + unsigned long size = SECTIONS_PER_ROOT * + sizeof(struct mem_section); + + if (!section) + return; + + if (slab_is_available()) + kfree(section); + else + free_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(nid), + virt_to_phys(section), size);Did you check what happens here if !node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)?
I'm sorry that I'm not catching your point. Please explain for more if necessary. I'm not sure you're talking about "kfree(section);" since the memory chunk is allocated either by kzalloc_node() or kzalloc(). Thanks, Gavin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>