Hello,

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:21:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:

Well it also has a prerequisite that memcg doesn't have: CONFIG_SWAP, so 

Right.

even if CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is folded into 
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR, then these should still depend on CONFIG_SWAP 
since configuring them would imply there is some limit to be enforced.

But to answer your question:

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  25777	   3644	   4128	  33549	   830d	memcontrol.o.swap_disabled
  27294	   4476	   4128	  35898	   8c3a	memcontrol.o.swap_enabled

I still wish it's folded into CONFIG_MEMCG and conditionalized just on
CONFIG_SWAP tho.

Is it really too painful to not create these files when 
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP is disabled?  If so, can we at least allow 
them to be opened but return -EINVAL if memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes is 
written?

Not at all, that was the first version anyway, which (IIRC) KAME
didn't like and suggested always creating those files.  KAME, what do
you think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>