Re: [PATCH 02/11] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed.
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2012-06-26 09:17:49
Also in:
cgroups, lkml
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
quoted
Nope, have you checked the output of /sys/kernel/slab/.../order when running slub? On my workstation 127 out of 316 caches have order-2 or higher by default.Well, this is still on the side of my argument, since this is still a majority of them being low ordered.
Ok, so what happens if I pass slub_min_order=2 on the command line? We never retry?
The code here does not necessarily have to retry - if I understand it correctly - we just retry for very small allocations because that is where our likelihood of succeeding is.
Well, the comment for NR_PAGES_TO_RETRY says /* * We need a number that is small enough to be likely to have been * reclaimed even under pressure, but not too big to trigger unnecessary * retries */ and mmzone.h says /* * PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER is the order at which allocations are deemed * costly to service. That is between allocation orders which should * coalesce naturally under reasonable reclaim pressure and those which * will not. */ #define PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER 3 so I'm trying to reconcile which one is correct. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>