Re: RFC: Easy-Reclaimable LRU list
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-24 11:09:53
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Rik van Riel [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/23/2012 12:45 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:quoted
I think this is interesting approach. Major concern is how to guarantee EReclaimable pages are really EReclaimable...Do you have any idea ? madviced pages are really EReclaimable ?I suspect the EReclaimable pages can only be clean page cache pages that are not mapped by any processes. Once somebody tries to use the page, mark_page_accessed will move it to another list.
100% agree.
quoted
A (very) small concern is will you use one more page-flags for this ? ;)This could be an issue on a 32 bit system, true.
Do we really need SwapBacked bit? Actually swap-backed is per-superblock attribute and don't change dynamically (i.e. no race happen). thus this bit might be able to move into page->mapping or page->mapping->host. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>