Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 2 authors, 2012-07-10
STALE5097d REVIEWED: 9 (9M)

[PATCH 12/16] netvm: Set PF_MEMALLOC as appropriate during SKB processing

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2012-06-22 14:31:03
Also in: lkml, netdev
Subsystem: networking [general], networking [sockets], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Willem de Bruijn, Linus Torvalds

In order to make sure pfmemalloc packets receive all memory
needed to proceed, ensure processing of pfmemalloc SKBs happens
under PF_MEMALLOC. This is limited to a subset of protocols that
are expected to be used for writing to swap. Taps are not allowed to
use PF_MEMALLOC as these are expected to communicate with userspace
processes which could be paged out.

[a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl: Ideas taken from various patches]
[jslaby@suse.cz: Lock imbalance fix]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 include/net/sock.h |    5 +++++
 net/core/dev.c     |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 net/core/sock.c    |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index ec838a5..1beeee1 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -744,8 +744,13 @@ static inline __must_check int sk_add_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
 	return 0;
 }
 
+extern int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+
 static inline int sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+		return __sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+
 	return sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index b8f3fdd..d2bcc19 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3138,6 +3138,23 @@ void netdev_rx_handler_unregister(struct net_device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_rx_handler_unregister);
 
+/*
+ * Limit the use of PFMEMALLOC reserves to those protocols that implement
+ * the special handling of PFMEMALLOC skbs.
+ */
+static bool skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	switch (skb->protocol) {
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_ARP):
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_8021Q):
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
 static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct packet_type *ptype, *pt_prev;
@@ -3147,14 +3164,27 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	bool deliver_exact = false;
 	int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
 	__be16 type;
+	unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
 
 	net_timestamp_check(!netdev_tstamp_prequeue, skb);
 
 	trace_netif_receive_skb(skb);
 
+	/*
+	 * PFMEMALLOC skbs are special, they should
+	 * - be delivered to SOCK_MEMALLOC sockets only
+	 * - stay away from userspace
+	 * - have bounded memory usage
+	 *
+	 * Use PF_MEMALLOC as this saves us from propagating the allocation
+	 * context down to all allocation sites.
+	 */
+	if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+		current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+
 	/* if we've gotten here through NAPI, check netpoll */
 	if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
-		return NET_RX_DROP;
+		goto out;
 
 	if (!skb->skb_iif)
 		skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
@@ -3175,7 +3205,7 @@ another_round:
 	if (skb->protocol == cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_8021Q)) {
 		skb = vlan_untag(skb);
 		if (unlikely(!skb))
-			goto out;
+			goto unlock;
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
@@ -3185,6 +3215,9 @@ another_round:
 	}
 #endif
 
+	if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
+		goto skip_taps;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype, &ptype_all, list) {
 		if (!ptype->dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev) {
 			if (pt_prev)
@@ -3193,13 +3226,18 @@ another_round:
 		}
 	}
 
+skip_taps:
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
 	skb = handle_ing(skb, &pt_prev, &ret, orig_dev);
 	if (!skb)
-		goto out;
+		goto unlock;
 ncls:
 #endif
 
+	if (sk_memalloc_socks() && skb_pfmemalloc(skb)
+				&& !skb_pfmemalloc_protocol(skb))
+		goto drop;
+
 	rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
 	if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
 		if (pt_prev) {
@@ -3209,7 +3247,7 @@ ncls:
 		if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, !rx_handler))
 			goto another_round;
 		else if (unlikely(!skb))
-			goto out;
+			goto unlock;
 	}
 
 	if (rx_handler) {
@@ -3219,7 +3257,7 @@ ncls:
 		}
 		switch (rx_handler(&skb)) {
 		case RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED:
-			goto out;
+			goto unlock;
 		case RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER:
 			goto another_round;
 		case RX_HANDLER_EXACT:
@@ -3249,6 +3287,7 @@ ncls:
 	if (pt_prev) {
 		ret = pt_prev->func(skb, skb->dev, pt_prev, orig_dev);
 	} else {
+drop:
 		atomic_long_inc(&skb->dev->rx_dropped);
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		/* Jamal, now you will not able to escape explaining
@@ -3257,8 +3296,10 @@ ncls:
 		ret = NET_RX_DROP;
 	}
 
-out:
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+out:
+	tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 159dccc..c551563 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -298,6 +298,22 @@ void sk_clear_memalloc(struct sock *sk)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_clear_memalloc);
 
+int __sk_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long pflags = current->flags;
+
+	/* these should have been dropped before queueing */
+	BUG_ON(!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_MEMALLOC));
+
+	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
+	ret = sk->sk_backlog_rcv(sk, skb);
+	tsk_restore_flags(current, pflags, PF_MEMALLOC);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sk_backlog_rcv);
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUPS)
 #if !defined(CONFIG_NET_CLS_CGROUP)
 int net_cls_subsys_id = -1;
-- 
1.7.9.2

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help