From: KOSAKI Motohiro <redacted>
When shared_policy_replace() failure, new->policy is not freed correctly.
The real problem is, shared mempolicy codes directly call kmem_cache_free()
in multiple place.
This patch creates proper wrapper function and uses it.
Note: The bug was introduced pre-git age (IOW, before 2.6.12-rc2).
Cc: Dave Jones <redacted>,
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <redacted>,
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <redacted>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d97d2db..7fb7d51 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2150,12 +2150,17 @@ mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long idx)
return pol;
}
+static void sp_free(struct sp_node *n)
+{
+ mpol_put(n->policy);
+ kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+}
+
static void sp_delete(struct shared_policy *sp, struct sp_node *n)
{
pr_debug("deleting %lx-l%lx\n", n->start, n->end);
rb_erase(&n->nd, &sp->root);
- mpol_put(n->policy);
- kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+ sp_free(n);
}
static void sp_node_init(struct sp_node *node, unsigned long start,@@ -2320,7 +2325,7 @@ int mpol_set_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *info,
}
err = shared_policy_replace(info, vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_pgoff+sz, new);
if (err && new)
- kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, new);
+ sp_free(new);
return err;
}
@@ -2337,9 +2342,7 @@ void mpol_free_shared_policy(struct shared_policy *p)
while (next) {
n = rb_entry(next, struct sp_node, nd);
next = rb_next(&n->nd);
- rb_erase(&n->nd, &p->root);
- mpol_put(n->policy);
- kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n);
+ sp_delete(p, n);
}
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
}--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>