Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] decrement static keys on real destroy time

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:52:13PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:

Andrew is right. It seems we will need that mutex after all. Just
this is not a race, and neither something that should belong in the
static_branch interface.

Yeah, with a completely different comment.  It just needs to wrap
->activated alteration and static key inc/dec, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>