Re: [PATCH 0/6] buffered write IO controller in balance_dirty_pages()
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Date: 2012-03-28 21:10:25
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:13:08PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Here is one possible solution to "buffered write IO controller", based on Linux v3.3 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/linux.git buffered-write-io-controller Features: - support blkio.weight
So this does proportional write bandwidth division on bdi for buffered writes?
- support blkio.throttle.buffered_write_bps
This is absolute limit systemwide or per bdi? [..]
The test results included in the last patch look pretty good in despite of the simple implementation. [PATCH 1/6] blk-cgroup: move blk-cgroup.h in include/linux/blk-cgroup.h [PATCH 2/6] blk-cgroup: account dirtied pages [PATCH 3/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth weight [PATCH 4/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit [PATCH 5/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - bandwidth limit interface [PATCH 6/6] blk-cgroup: buffered write IO controller - debug trace
Hi Fengguang, Only patch 0 and patch 4 have shown up in my mail box. Same seems to be the case for lkml. I am wondering what happened to rest of the patches. Will understand the patches better once I have the full set. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>