Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name
From: Fengguang Wu <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-29 14:10:46
Also in:
lkml
From: Fengguang Wu <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-29 14:10:46
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to start with, these seem more like debugging messages? I can't see how they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be debug instead?Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work. Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have full information.
Nod, and it won't disturb the users unless something really bad happens. I'm fine with the patch, too. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>