Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2012-03-29

Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: Let the compiler add the function name

From: Fengguang Wu <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-29 14:10:46
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:09:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
I agree with your change, but I'm not sure these should be pr_info() to 
start with, these seem more like debugging messages?  I can't see how 
they'd be useful in standard operation so could we just convert them to be 
debug instead?
Well it tells why the page recovery didn't work.

Memory recovery is a somewhat obscure path, so it's better to have
full information.
Nod, and it won't disturb the users unless something really bad happens.

I'm fine with the patch, too.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help