Re: [PATCH] memcg: make threshold index in the right position
From: Sha Zhengju <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-02 10:54:25
Also in:
cgroups
On 02/02/2012 06:14 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:45:19PM +0800, Sha Zhengju wrote:quoted
From: Sha Zhengju<redacted> Index current_threshold may point to threshold that just equal to usage after __mem_cgroup_threshold is triggerd.I don't see it. Could you describe conditions?
It is because of the following code path in __mem_cgroup_threshold:
{
...
i = t->current_threshold;
for (; i >= 0 && unlikely(t->entries[i].threshold > usage); i--)
eventfd_signal(t->entries[i].eventfd, 1);
i++;
for (; i < t->size && unlikely(t->entries[i].threshold <=
usage); i++)
eventfd_signal(t->entries[i].eventfd, 1);
t->current_threshold = i - 1;
...
}
For example:
now:
threshold array: 3 5 7 9 (usage = 6)
^
index
next turn:
threshold array: 3 5 7 9 (usage = 7)
^
index
after registering a new event(threshold = 10):
threshold array: 3 5 7 9 10 (usage = 7)
^
indexquoted
But after registering a new event, it will change (pointing to threshold just below usage). So make it consistent here. Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<redacted> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov<redacted> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju<redacted> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 7 ++++--- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 22d94f5..79f4a58 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_threshold { /* For threshold */ struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary { - /* An array index points to threshold just below usage. */ + /* An array index points to threshold just below or equal to usage. */ int current_threshold; /* Size of entries[] */ unsigned int size;@@ -4319,14 +4319,15 @@ static int mem_cgroup_usage_register_event(struct cgroup *cgrp, /* Find current threshold */ new->current_threshold = -1; for (i = 0; i< size; i++) { - if (new->entries[i].threshold< usage) { + if (new->entries[i].threshold<= usage) { /* * new->current_threshold will not be used until * rcu_assign_pointer(), so it's safe to increment * it here. */ ++new->current_threshold; - } + } else + break; } /* Free old spare buffer and save old primary buffer as spare */-- 1.7.4.1
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>