Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2012-02-09
STALE5270d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)
Revisions (5)
  1. v2 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v5 [diff vs current]
  4. v8 current
  5. v9 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v8 6/8] fs: only send IPI to invalidate LRU BH when needed

From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Date: 2012-02-05 13:48:40
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml
Subsystem: filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds

In several code paths, such as when unmounting a file system (but
not only) we send an IPI to ask each cpu to invalidate its local
LRU BHs.

For multi-cores systems that have many cpus that may not have
any LRU BH because they are idle or because they have not performed
any file system accesses since last invalidation (e.g. CPU crunching
on high perfomance computing nodes that write results to shared
memory or only using filesystems that do not use the bh layer.)
This can lead to loss of performance each time someone switches
the KVM (the virtual keyboard and screen type, not the hypervisor)
if it has a USB storage stuck in.

This patch attempts to only send an IPI to cpus that have LRU BH.

Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <redacted>
CC: Christoph Lameter <redacted>
CC: Chris Metcalf <redacted>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted>
CC: Russell King <redacted>
CC: linux-mm@kvack.org
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
CC: Matt Mackall <redacted>
CC: Sasha Levin <redacted>
CC: Rik van Riel <redacted>
CC: Andi Kleen <redacted>
CC: Mel Gorman <redacted>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
CC: Avi Kivity <redacted>
CC: Michal Nazarewicz <redacted>
CC: Kosaki Motohiro <redacted>
CC: Milton Miller <redacted>
---
 fs/buffer.c |   15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 1a30db7..baa075e 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1384,10 +1384,23 @@ static void invalidate_bh_lru(void *arg)
 	}
 	put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
 }
+
+static bool has_bh_in_lru(int cpu, void *dummy)
+{
+	struct bh_lru *b = per_cpu_ptr(&bh_lrus, cpu);
+	int i;
 	
+	for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
+		if (b->bhs[i])
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
 {
-	on_each_cpu(invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1);
+	on_each_cpu_cond(has_bh_in_lru, invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_bh_lrus);
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help