On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:31:01 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov [off-list ref] wrote:

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:51:36 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

v3 changes:
* inactive-ratio reworked again, now it always calculated from from scratch
* hierarchical pte reference bits filter in memory-cgroup reclaimer
* fixed two bugs in locking, found by Hugh Dickins
* locking functions slightly simplified
* new patch for isolated pages accounting
* new patch with lru interleaving

This patchset is based on next-20120210

git: https://github.com/koct9i/linux/commits/lruvec-v3

I wonder.... I just wonder...if we can split a lruvec in a zone into small
pieces of lruvec and have splitted LRU-lock per them, do we need per-memcg-lrulock ?

What per-memcg-lrulock? I don't have it.
last patch splits lruvecs in memcg with the same factor.

Okay, I missed it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>