On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
quoted
Great! So, why not letting the time tell us if this feature will be obsoleted
or not? I'd rather have this patch obsoleted by another one proven better, than
just stay still waiting for something that might, or might not, happen in the
future.
Because (1) you're adding a sysctl that we don't want to obsolete and
remove from the kernel that someone will come to depend on and then have
to find an alternative solution like /dev/mem_notify, and (2) people parse
messages like this that are emitted to the kernel log that we don't want
to break in the future.
So NACK on this approach.
Right. We should drop the sysctl and make it into a kernel command line
debugging option instead.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>