Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 3 authors, 2012-02-20

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] mm: memory book keeping and lru_lock splitting

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-16 02:05:36
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:57:04 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov [off-list ref] wrote:
There should be no logic changes in this patchset, this is only tossing bits around.
[ This patchset is on top some memcg cleanup/rework patches,
  which I sent to linux-mm@ today/yesterday ]

Most of things in this patchset are self-descriptive, so here brief plan:
AFAIK, Hugh Dickins said he has per-zone-per-lru-lock and is testing it.
So, please CC him and Johannes, at least.

* Transmute struct lruvec into struct book. Like real book this struct will
  store set of pages for one zone. It will be working unit for reclaimer code.
[ If memcg is disabled in config there will only one book embedded into struct zone ]
Why you need to add new structure rahter than enhancing lruvec ?
"book" means a binder of pages ?

* move page-lru counters to struct book
[ this adds extra overhead in add_page_to_lru_list()/del_page_from_lru_list() for
  non-memcg case, but I believe it will be invisible, only one non-atomic add/sub
  in the same cacheline with lru list ]
This seems straightforward.
* unify inactive_list_is_low_global() and cleanup reclaimer code
* replace struct mem_cgroup_zone with single pointer to struct book
Hm, ok.
* optimize page to book translations, move it upper in the call stack,
  replace some struct zone arguments with struct book pointer.
a page->book transrater from patch 2/15

+struct book *page_book(struct page *page)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
+	struct page_cgroup *pc;
+
+	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
+		return &page_zone(page)->book;
+
+	pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
+	if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
+		return &page_zone(page)->book;
+	/* Ensure pc->mem_cgroup is visible after reading PCG_USED. */
+	smp_rmb();
+	mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc->mem_cgroup,
+			page_to_nid(page), page_zonenum(page));
+	return &mz->book;
+}

What happens when pc->mem_cgroup is rewritten by move_account() ?
Where is the guard for lockless access of this ?

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help