Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2012-01-12

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: page allocator: Do not drain per-cpu lists via IPI from page allocator context

From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Date: 2012-01-12 15:13:32
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 16:51 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
quoted
What I can't figure out is why we don't need  get/put_online_cpus()
pair around each and every call
to on_each_cpu everywhere? and if we do, perhaps making it a part of
on_each_cpu is the way to go?

Something like:
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index f66a1b2..cfa3882 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -691,11 +691,15 @@ void on_each_cpu(void (*func) (void *info), void
*info, int wait)
 {
        unsigned long flags;

+       BUG_ON(in_atomic());
+
+       get_online_cpus();
        preempt_disable();
Your preempt_disable() here serializes against hotplug..
I'm probably daft, but why didn't it work for the page allocator then?

Mel's description reads: "Part of the problem is the page allocator is
sending IPIs using
on_each_cpu() without calling get_online_cpus() to prevent changes
to the online cpumask."

on_each_cpu() disables preemption in master as well...

Gilad




Thanks,
Gilad

-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@benyossef.com
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com

"Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider."
-- Mike Galbraith, LKML

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help