RE: [PATCH] mm: implement WasActive page flag (for improving cleancache)
From: Dan Magenheimer <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-26 21:28:19
Also in:
lkml
From: Dave Hansen [mailto:dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com] Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: implement WasActive page flag (for improving cleancache)
Thanks for the review Dave!
On 01/25/2012 01:58 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:quoted
(Feedback welcome if there is a different/better way to do this without using a page flag!) Since about 2.6.27, the page replacement algorithm maintains an "active" bit to help decide which pages are most eligible to reclaim, see http://linux-mm.org/PageReplacementDesign This "active' information is also useful to cleancache but is lost by the time that cleancache has the opportunity to preserve the pageful of data. This patch adds a new page flag "WasActive" to retain the state. The flag may possibly be useful elsewhere.I guess cleancache itself is clearing the bit, right? I didn't see any clearing going on in the patch.
No, there are no changes in cleancache.c so it isn't clearing the bit.
I do think it also needs to get cleared on the way in to the page allocator. Otherwise: PageSetWasActive(page); free_page(page); ... another_user_page = get_free_page() // now cleancache sees the active bit for the prev user Or am I missing somewhere it gets cleared non-explicitly somewhere?
True, it is not getting cleared and it should be, good catch! I'll find the place to add the call to ClearPageWasActive() for v2. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>