Re: [PATCH v2 -mm 3/3] mm: only defer compaction for failed order and higher
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-25 16:21:17
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:55:05AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:41 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:quoted
quoted
--- a/mm/compaction.c +++ b/mm/compaction.c@@ -673,9 +673,18 @@ static int __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct compact_control *cc) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc->freepages); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc->migratepages); - if (cc->order< 0 || !compaction_deferred(zone)) + if (cc->order< 0 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order)) compact_zone(zone, cc); + if (cc->order> 0) { + int ok = zone_watermark_ok(zone, cc->order, + low_wmark_pages(zone), 0, 0); + if (ok&& cc->order> zone->compact_order_failed) + zone->compact_order_failed = cc->order + 1; + else if (!ok&& cc->sync) + defer_compaction(zone, cc->order); + } +That needs a comment. I think what you're trying to do is reset compat_order_failed once compaction is successful. The "!ok&& cc->sync" check may be broken. __compact_pgdat() is called from kswapd, not direct compaction so cc->sync will not be true.The problem with doing that is that we would be deferring synchronous compaction (by allocators), just because asynchronous compaction from kswapd failed...
I should have been clear. I was not suggesting that we defer compaction here for !cc->sync. I was pointing out that the code as-is is dead.
That is the reason the code is like it is above. And indeed, it will not defer compaction from this code path right now.
Ok, that was my understanding, I just wanted to be sure I understood your intentions.
Then again, neither does async compaction from page allocators defer compaction - only sync compaction does.
Yep, this is on purpose.
If it turns out we need a separate compaction deferral for async compaction, we can always introduce that later, and this code will be ready for it.
Ok, I can accept that.
If you prefer, I can replace the whole "else if" bit with a big fat comment explaining why we cannot currently defer compaction from this point.
Explaining that it is dead code for kswapd would also do. If you do replace the code, add a WARN_ON(cc->sync) in case the assumption changes in the future so defer_compaction() gets thought about properly. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>