Re: [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rik van Riel [off-list ref] wrote:

That seems like a horrible idea, because there is no guarantee that
the kernel will continue to use NR_ACTIVE_ANON and NR_ACTIVE_FILE
internally in the future.

What is exported to userspace must be somewhat independent of the
specifics of how the kernel implements things internally.

Exactly, that's what I'm also interested in.

                        Pekka

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>