Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 6 authors, 2011-11-15

Re: INFO: possible recursive locking detected: get_partial_node() on 3.2-rc1

From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-11 14:57:24
Also in: lkml

Looks like a false positive.

put_cpu_partial() can be called with a parameter to indicate if draining
of the per cpu partial list should be allowed ("drain"). Draining requires
taking the list lock. "drain" is set to 0 when called from
get_partial_node() (where we are already holding the list lock) so no
deadlock should be possible.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help