Re: [patch 1/5]thp: improve the error code path
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2011-11-10 04:43:41
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Before after won't matter much I guess... If you really want to clean the code, I wonder what is exactly the point of those dummy functions if we can't call those outside of #ifdefs.
You can, you just need to declare the actuals that you pass to the dummy
functions for CONFIG_SYSFS=n as well. Or, convert the dummy functions to
do
#define sysfs_remove_group(kobj, grp) do {} while (0)
but good luck getting that passed Andrew :)
I mean a cleanup that adds more #ifdefs when there are explicit dummy functions which I assume are meant to be used outside of #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS doesn't sound so clean in the first place. I understand you need to refactor the code above to call those outside of #ifdefs but hey if you're happy with #ifdef I'm happy too :). It just looks fishy to read sysfs.h dummy functions and #ifdefs. When I wrote the code I hardly could have wondered about the sysfs #ifdefs but at this point it's only cleanups I'm seeing so I actually noticed that.
The cleaniest solution would probably be to just extract all the calls that depend on CONFIG_SYSFS out of hugepage_init(), call it hugepage_sysfs_init(), and then return a failure code if it fails to setup then do the error handling there. hugepage_sysfs_init() would be defined right after the attributes are defined. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>