Re: [patch] oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: 2011-09-30 15:34:50
Also in:
lkml
On 09/29, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 29-09-11 18:37:24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:quoted
Oh, I don't think so. For what? This doesn't close other races, and in fact the fatal_signal_pending() this patch adds is itself racy, SIGKILL can come in between.OK, I think I see your point. You mean that oom will send KILL after both fatal_signal_pending in refrigerator and signal_pending check in schedule, right?
No, schedule()->signal_pending_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) doesn't check the signals. I simply meant if (fatal_signal_pending()) // <--- SIGKILL from oom try_to_freeze();
This is what the follow up fix from David is doing. Check frozen in select_bad_process if the task is TIF_MEMDIE and thaw the process. And it seems that the David's follow up fix is sufficient so let's leave refrigerator alone.
Agreed, afaics this should fix all races (although I didn't read the whole discussion, perhaps I missed something else). And in this case we do not even need to modify oom_kill_task/etc, select_bad_process() will be called again and notice the frozen task eventually. Afaics. Or, as Tejun suggests, we can implement the race-free kill-even-if-frozen later. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>