On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:04:05PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Minchan Kim [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

When racing between putback_lru_page and shmem_unlock happens,

s/shmem_unlock/shmem_lock/

I did it intentionally for represent shmem_lock with user = 1, lock = 0.
If you think it makes others confusing, I will change in next version.
Thanks.

quoted

progrom execution order is as follows, but clear_bit in processor #1
could be reordered right before spin_unlock of processor #1.
Then, the page would be stranded on the unevictable list.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>