On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:51 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:

I have not had time to get into this. I was hoping you could come up
with something. 

Thanks! 
Um, let me have some try.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Alex,Shi [off-list ref] wrote:
        On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:04 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
        > Sorry to be that late with a response but my email setup is
        screwed
        > up.
        >
        > I was more thinking about the number of slab pages in the
        partial
        > caches rather than the size of the objects itself being an
        issue. I
        > believe that was /sys/kernel/slab/*/cpu_partial.
        >
        > That setting could be tuned further before merging. An
        increase there
        > causes additional memory to be caught in the partial list.
        But it
        > reduces the node lock pressure further.
        >
        
        
        Yeah, I think so. The more cpu partial page, the quicker to
        getting
        slabs. Maybe it's better to considerate the system memory size
        to set
        them. Do you has some plan or suggestions on tunning?
        
        
        
        

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>