On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:41 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:

On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 20:41 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:

quoted

@@ -4584,7 +4584,8 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabstats_operations = {
 
 static int __init slab_proc_init(void)
 {
-       proc_create("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
+       proc_create("slabinfo", S_IWUSR | S_IRUSR, NULL,
+                   &proc_slabinfo_operations);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK
        proc_create("slab_allocators", 0, NULL, &proc_sla 

If you respin this, please don't muck with the whitespace.

OK, I was just removing checkpatch warnings.

 Otherwise,
I'm fine with this.  Distros are already starting to do this anyway in
userspace.

Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <redacted>

Thank you!

-- 
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>