Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2011-08-29

RE: Subject: [PATCH V7 2/4] mm: frontswap: core code

From: Dan Magenheimer <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-26 14:53:56
Also in: lkml

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [mailto:kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com]
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH V7 2/4] mm: frontswap: core code

On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Dan Magenheimer [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [mailto:kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com]
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH V7 2/4] mm: frontswap: core code
quoted
quoted
BTW, Do I have a chance to implement frontswap accounting per cgroup
(under memcg) ? Or Do I need to enable/disale switch for frontswap per memcg ?
Do you think it is worth to do ?
I'm not very familiar with cgroups or memcg but I think it may be possible
to implement transcendent memory with cgroup as the "guest" and the default
cgroup as the "host" to allow for more memory elasticity for cgroups.
(See http://lwn.net/Articles/454795/ for a good overview of all of
transcendent memory.)
Ok, I'll see it.

I just wonder following case.

Assume 2 memcgs.
	memcg X: memory limit = 300M.
	memcg Y: memory limit = 300M.

This limitation is done for performance isolation.
When using frontswap, X and Y can cause resource confliction in frontswap and
performance of X and Y cannot be predictable.
Oops, sorry for the extra reply, but I realize I cut/paste to
reply to this part and neglected to reply.

IMHO, it is impossible to do both dynamic resource optimization and
performance isolation.  So if the purpose of containers is for performance
isolation you need to partition ALL resources, including CPUs (and
not even split threads) and I/O devices.  And even then there will
be unpredictable use of some shared system resource (such as maybe
a QPI link or PCI bus).  If you are not partitioning all resources,
then RAM is just another resource that should be dynamically optimized
which may result in performance variations.  With strict policies,
maybe some quality-of-service guarantees can be made.

But that's just my opinion...

Dan

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help