On 08/22/2011 03:17 AM, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:

Hi Ingo, Peter, Thomas,

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 13:05 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:

quoted

As the changes are not intrusive, we'd want to see this feature in the
upstream kernel.  If you know why the patch cannot be a part of the
upstream kernel - please tell me, I'll try to address the issues.

Any comments on the RFC?  Otherwise, may I resend it as a PATCH for
inclusion?

Thanks!

Conceptually:

I also have to admit to being somewhat skeptical to the concept on a
littleendian architecture like x86.

Code-wise:

The code is horrific; it is full of open-coded magic numbers; it also
puts a function called arch_get_unmapped_exec_area() in a generic file,
which could best be described as "WTF" -- the arch_ prefix we use
specifically to denote a per-architecture hook function.

As such, your claim that the changes are not intrusive is plain false.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>