Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2011-08-18

Re: [PATCH] avoid null pointer access in vm_struct

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2011-08-17 19:40:56
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:28:48 +0900
Mitsuo Hayasaka [off-list ref] wrote:
The /proc/vmallocinfo shows information about vmalloc allocations in vmlist
that is a linklist of vm_struct. It, however, may access pages field of
vm_struct where a page was not allocated, which results in a null pointer
access and leads to a kernel panic.

Why this happen:
For example, in __vmalloc_area_node, the nr_pages field of vm_struct are
set to the expected number of pages to be allocated, before the actual
pages allocations. At the same time, when the /proc/vmallocinfo is read, it
accesses the pages field of vm_struct according to the nr_pages field at
show_numa_info(). Thus, a null pointer access happens.

Patch:
This patch avoids accessing the pages field with unallocated page when
show_numa_info() is called. So, it can solve this problem.
Do we have a similar race when running __vunmap() in parallel with
show_numa_info()?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
index 7ef0903..e2ec5b0 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2472,13 +2472,16 @@ static void show_numa_info(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_struct *v)
 	if (NUMA_BUILD) {
 		unsigned int nr, *counters = m->private;
 
-		if (!counters)
+		if (!counters || !v->nr_pages || !v->pages)
 			return;
 
 		memset(counters, 0, nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int));
 
-		for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr++)
+		for (nr = 0; nr < v->nr_pages; nr++) {
+			if (!v->pages[nr])
+				break;
 			counters[page_to_nid(v->pages[nr])]++;
+		}
 
 		for_each_node_state(nr, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
 			if (counters[nr])
I think this has memory ordering issues: it requires that this CPU see
the modification to ->nr_pages and ->pages in the same order as the CPU
which is writing ->nr_pages, ->pages and ->pages[x].  Perhaps fixable
by taking vmlist_lock appropriately.

I suspect that the real bug is that __vmalloc_area_node() and its
caller made the new vmap_area globally visible before it was fully
initialised.  If we were to fix that, the /proc/vmallocinfo read would
not encounter this vm_struct at all.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help