Re: [PATCH 4/4] memcg: get rid of percpu_charge_mutex lock
From: Michal Hocko <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-08 21:47:09
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
control group - memory resource controller (memcg), memory management, the rest · Maintainers:
Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
On Mon 08-08-11 20:47:38, Johannes Weiner wrote: [...]
quoted
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -2071,7 +2071,6 @@ struct memcg_stock_pcp { #define FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE (0) }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memcg_stock_pcp, memcg_stock); -static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex); /* * Try to consume stocked charge on this cpu. If success, one page is consumed@@ -2178,7 +2177,8 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem, bool sync) for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu); - if (test_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags)) + if (mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(root_mem, stock->cached) && + test_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags)) flush_work(&stock->work); } out:This hunk triggers a crash for me, as the draining is already done and stock->cached reset to NULL when dereferenced here. Oops is attached.
Thanks for catching this. We are racing synchronous drain from force_empty and async drain from reclaim, I guess. Sync. checked whether it should wait for the work and the cache got drained and set to NULL. First of all we must not dereference the cached mem without FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE bit test. We have to be sure that there is some draining on that cache. stock->cached is set to NULL before we clear the bit (I guess we need to add a barrier into drain_local_stock). So we should see mem either as NULL or still valid (I have to think some more about "still valid" part - maybe we will need rcu_read_lock).
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f4ec4e7..626c916 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -2197,8 +2197,10 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem, bool sync) for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu); - if (mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(root_mem, stock->cached) && - test_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags)) + struct mem_cgroup *mem = stock->cached; + if (test_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags) && + mem && mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(root_mem, mem) + ) flush_work(&stock->work); } out:
We have this loop in drain_all_stock():
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
struct mem_cgroup *mem;
mem = stock->cached;
if (!mem || !stock->nr_pages)
continue;
if (!mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(root_mem, mem))
continue;
if (!test_and_set_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags)) {
if (cpu == curcpu)
drain_local_stock(&stock->work);
else
schedule_work_on(cpu, &stock->work);
}
}
The only thing that stabilizes stock->cached is the knowledge that
there are still pages accounted to the memcg.Yes you are right we have to set FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE before nr_pages check (and do the appropriate cleanup on the continue paths). This looks quite ugly, though.
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f4ec4e7..eca46141 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c@@ -2179,17 +2179,23 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem, bool sync) struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu); struct mem_cgroup *mem; + /* Try to lock the cache */ + if(test_and_set_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags)) + continue; + mem = stock->cached; if (!mem || !stock->nr_pages) - continue; + goto unlock_cache; if (!mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(root_mem, mem)) - continue; - if (!test_and_set_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags)) { - if (cpu == curcpu) - drain_local_stock(&stock->work); - else - schedule_work_on(cpu, &stock->work); - } + goto unlock_cache; + + if (cpu == curcpu) + drain_local_stock(&stock->work); + else + schedule_work_on(cpu, &stock->work); + continue; +unlock_cache: + clear_bit(FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE, &stock->flags); ^^^^^
need a barrier? } if (!sync)
Without the mutex serializing this code, can't there be a concurrent execution that leads to stock->cached being drained, becoming empty and freed by someone else between the stock->nr_pages check and the ancestor check, resulting in use after free? What makes stock->cached safe to dereference?
We are using FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE as a lock for local draining. I guess it should be sufficient. mutex which was used previously caused that async draining was exclusive so a root_mem that has potentially many relevant caches has to back off because other mem wants to clear the cache on the same CPU. I will think about this tomorrow (with fresh eyes). I think we should be able to be without mutex. Anyway thanks for the really good report!
[ 2313.442944] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018 [ 2313.443935] IP: [<ffffffff81083b70>] css_is_ancestor+0x20/0x70 [ 2313.443935] PGD 4ae7a067 PUD 4adc4067 PMD 0 [ 2313.443935] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2313.443935] CPU 0 [ 2313.443935] Pid: 19677, comm: rmdir Tainted: G W 3.0.0-mm1-00188-gf38d32b #35 ECS MCP61M-M3/MCP61M-M3 [ 2313.443935] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81083b70>] [<ffffffff81083b70>] css_is_ancestor+0x20/0x70 [ 2313.443935] RSP: 0018:ffff880077b09c88 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 2313.443935] RAX: ffff8800781bb310 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000003e [ 2313.443935] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8800779f7c00 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 2313.443935] RBP: ffff880077b09c98 R08: ffffffff818a4e88 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 2313.443935] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dead000000100100 R12: ffff8800779f7c00 [ 2313.443935] R13: ffff8800779f7c00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88007bc0eb80 [ 2313.443935] FS: 00007f5d689ec720(0000) GS:ffff88007bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 2313.443935] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 2313.443935] CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 000000004ad57000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 2313.443935] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 2313.443935] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 2313.443935] Process rmdir (pid: 19677, threadinfo ffff880077b08000, task ffff8800781bb310) [ 2313.443935] Stack: [ 2313.443935] ffffffff818a4e88 000000000000eb80 ffff880077b09ca8 ffffffff810feba3 [ 2313.443935] ffff880077b09d08 ffffffff810feccf ffff880077b09cf8 0000000000000001 [ 2313.443935] ffff88007bd0eb80 0000000000000001 ffff880077af2000 0000000000000000 [ 2313.443935] Call Trace: [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff810feba3>] mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree+0x33/0x40 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff810feccf>] drain_all_stock+0x11f/0x170 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81103211>] mem_cgroup_force_empty+0x231/0x6d0 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81111872>] ? path_put+0x22/0x30 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff8111c925>] ? __d_lookup+0xb5/0x170 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff811036c4>] mem_cgroup_pre_destroy+0x14/0x20 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81080559>] cgroup_rmdir+0xb9/0x500 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81063990>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0xb0/0xb0 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81114d26>] vfs_rmdir+0x86/0xe0 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff811233d3>] ? mnt_want_write+0x43/0x80 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81114e7b>] do_rmdir+0xfb/0x110 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff81114ea6>] sys_rmdir+0x16/0x20 [ 2313.443935] [<ffffffff8154d76b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 2313.443935] Code: b7 42 0a 5d c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 10 48 89 5d f0 4c 89 65 f8 66 66 66 66 90 48 89 fb 49 89 f4 e8 10 85 00 00 [ 2313.443935] 8b 43 18 49 8b 54 24 18 48 85 d2 74 05 48 85 c0 75 15 31 db -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs SUSE LINUX s.r.o. Lihovarska 1060/12 190 00 Praha 9 Czech Republic -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>