On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:59:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 05:33:05AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
Johannes, Mel, Wu,
Am adding Jan Kara as he has been working on writeback efficiency
recently as well.
quoted
Dave has been stressing some XFS patches of mine that remove the XFS
internal writeback clustering in favour of using write_cache_pages.
Against what kernel? 2.6.38 was a disaster for reclaim I've been
finding out this week. I don't know about 2.6.38.8. 2.6.39 was better.
The patch series is against current 3.0-rc, I assume that's what Dave
tested as well.
I'm assuming "test 180" is from xfstests which was not one of the tests
I used previously. To run with 1000 files instead of 100, was the file
"180" simply editted to make it look like this loop instead?
Yes. to both questions.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>