Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 2 authors, 2011-07-18

Re: [PATCH 08/14] inode: move to per-sb LRU locks

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-07-11 19:21:44
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:14:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner <redacted>

With the inode LRUs moving to per-sb structures, there is no longer
a need for a global inode_lru_lock. The locking can be made more
fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU
operations of different filesytsems completely from each other.
Btw, any reason this is not done for dcache_lru_lock?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help