Re: [PATCH 08/14] inode: move to per-sb LRU locks
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-07-11 19:21:44
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-07-11 19:21:44
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:14:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner <redacted> With the inode LRUs moving to per-sb structures, there is no longer a need for a global inode_lru_lock. The locking can be made more fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU operations of different filesytsems completely from each other.
Btw, any reason this is not done for dcache_lru_lock? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>