Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Prevent LRU churning
From: Minchan Kim <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-29 08:23:25
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:16:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:04:33 +0900 Minchan Kim [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Test result is following as. 1) Elapased time 10GB file decompressed. Old inorder inorder + pagevec flush[10/10] 01:47:50.88 01:43:16.16 01:40:27.18 2) failure of inorder lru For test, it isolated 375756 pages. Only 45875 pages(12%) are put backed to out-of-order(ie, head of LRU) Others, 329963 pages(88%) are put backed to in-order (ie, position of old page in LRU).I'm getting more and more worried about how complex MM is becoming and this patchset doesn't take us in a helpful direction :(
Hmm. I think it's not too complicated stuff. :( But I understand your concern enoughly.
But it's hard to argue with numbers like that. Please respin patches 6-10?
Of course, but it would be rather late due to my business and other interesting features. I will try to get a new data point in next version. Thanks, Andrew.
-- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>