Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 6 authors, 2011-06-23

Re: [PATCH] slob: push the min alignment to long long

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-06-15 22:13:55

From: Matt Mackall <redacted>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:55 -0500
In general, I think the right thing is to require every arch to
explicitly document its alignment requirements via defines in the kernel
headers so that random hackers don't have to scour the internet for
datasheets on obscure architectures they don't care about.
Blink... because the compiler doesn't provide a portable way to
do this, right? :-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help