Re: [PATCH] slob: push the min alignment to long long
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-06-15 22:13:55
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-06-15 22:13:55
From: Matt Mackall <redacted> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:55:55 -0500
In general, I think the right thing is to require every arch to explicitly document its alignment requirements via defines in the kernel headers so that random hackers don't have to scour the internet for datasheets on obscure architectures they don't care about.
Blink... because the compiler doesn't provide a portable way to do this, right? :-) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>